Slantedfloor
Distinguished member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2020
- Posts
- 525
My opinion is that it’s likely flagged by the address not the name. But who knows.@Mick2 what’s the solution to this? A post office box?what if someone lived in a huge apartment building w 200 units…you think they flag by name? Can you alter the spelling or use a nick name or add like “unit A” to “foil a flag” ?
Thanks Mick. Your explanation makes perfect sense. Easy repeat seizures for the CPB. Makes it look like they are stepping up their game just by focusing on nonsense. Meanwhile major contraband is getting through somewhere.@Caddy99 Honestly, it's probably just a numbers thing. Parcels sent to addresses that have been seized in the recent past are probably of exponentially higher chance to contain an item prohibited by law than just a random pack sent in the mail to an address without any history. The overwhelming number of packages coming through every single day make it impossible to examine every single one in close detail. In fact, the vast majority probably get sniffed by a dog, pass a quick x-ray screen that can be fooled by vendors with good stealth, and are quickly through. By cbp placing their focus on previously seized addresses they've significantly upped their chances of finding something.
@Mick2 what’s the solution to this? A post office box?what if someone lived in a huge apartment building w 200 units…you think they flag by name? Can you alter the spelling or use a nick name or add like “unit A” to “foil a flag” ?
Ad blocking browser plugins interfere with some features of this forum. For the best site experience please disable your ad blocker.