jaders
Renowned member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2012
- Posts
- 6,380
I totally agree! When you’re rich and famous it isn’t that much different than a movie producer “forcing” an actress (or actor) to give sexual favors, or a boss who has power over their employees demanding the same. Power gives privilege and trying to blame others for what Perry chose to ingest is pathetic as hell imho…@jaders i have a feeling perry would have continued to make poor choices, as he was an addict. he even needed a sobriety coach on the friends set, so many years ago. celebrities use their power and money to force others to their will. i looked up the case and he definitely was involved with some shady characters but to be real he sought them out. i still think the assistant was forced into this, due to his job and the power imbalance. what's missing from the news is perry's culpability. he apparently asked for his assistant to "load him up a big one." maybe it's just the questionable reporting but they make out perry to be a victim. (i don't know much about ketamine, as i thought it came in pills. at least perry had the nous to get regulated prescription drugs)
i just resent that the few real addicts like perry ruin things for everyone else. addiction is a disease and an awful one. yet we do wave off alcoholism because it's legal while drug deaths set off a feeding frenzy. addicts should be removed from the discussion, not used by the government to limit everyone else. plenty of people can have a glass of wine and stop. plenty of people can take their prescribed pks for years with no problem. what's the difference?
i remember a similar witch hunt with anna nicole smith. she used aliases when getting prescribed meds to avoid press and blame was placed on her bf/lawyer. he was finally acquited (he forced her to hide her identity? seriously?) i felt sorry for the guy because no one forced anna to mix chloral hydrate with her cocktail of drugs. the poor guy spent years in court fighting the charges before a judge dismissed the case, saying the guy had suffered enough (and cost the government 500k to boot). who decided to waste public money on such a bizarre charge?
If we would put the responsibility where it belongs, no one else would need to be punished or forced to go without, for other folks’ transgressions. It just seems so simple to me, honestly…